I
just finished reading M. T. Anderson’s Symphony
for the City of the Dead: Dmitri Shostakovich and the Siege of Leningrad. This
is truly a mind-gripping book for YAs and adults. Sure, I knew some of the
details before I started reading—the German invasion of Russia, the unspeakable
acts of Stalin and Hitler, the impact of history on everyday life, and the
enormous power of music. Yet there was still so much that I didn’t know about—the
life of Dmitri Shostakovich during the siege of Leningrad, the efforts to copy
the symphony on microfilm in order to send it to the U.S., the terrible human suffering
and loss of life, and the persistence of the human spirit in even the worst of
times.
I
found this complex book totally engaging.
I found myself thinking about it during the day and stealing time from
my schedule to read just a bit more. I talked about to everyone who crossed my
path. That’s because there is so
much in this book to think about: questions of freedom and control, the power
of art and music to change our lives, the moral decisions we make about war and
peace, the quality of our personal relationships, the nature of heroes and
villains, and more.
Some
of the events described were so painful that I had to stop reading and do
something else for a while. Other times, I simply had to read on to see what
would happen next. Not only did I learn a great deal about Shostakovich and his
family, I learned about the incredibly difficult circumstances in which he
lived. In addition, there was the author’s presence in the book, reminding me that
this history was difficult to construct. Not only was a massive amount of
research necessary, but also it was hard to tell if certain sources were even credible.
To learn more about this book, see Betsy Bird’s informative interview with M.
T. Anderson at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSVt1UfagQM
Reading
this book prompted me to think about this important question: What if complex,
mind-gripping books drove our curriculum, at least part of the time? What if pacing
calendars mandating the topics teachers must cover during specific months were
replaced every so often with time given over to mind-gripping books? What if we
focused some attention on reader response—how books make us feel? The passion
for reading just might return. And, surprisingly enough, those Common Core and
subject matter standards would still be embedded in the experience of reading a
responding. We could, in effect, bring back “feelings” while still teaching “facts.” We could have both.
No comments:
Post a Comment